|
STRENGTHS
(internal to
project, can be influenced):
|
WEAKNESSES
(internal to project,
can be influenced):
|
|
OPPORTUNITIES
(external to
project, difficult to influenced):
|
THREATHS
(external to
project, difficult to influenced):
|
|
STRENGTHS
(internal to
project, can be influenced):
-
Implementation will not require much of
time nor money
-
Sustainable development stories are easy
to identify in the community (recycling, transportation means, etc.)
-
Volunteers are easy to mobilize for such
project
|
WEAKNESSES
(internal to
project, can be influenced):
-
Lack of equipment
-
Lack of skills and programmes for
video/photo editing
-
Community members may not understand their
role in promotion of sustainable development based on the photo/video stories
only
|
|
OPPORTUNITIES
(external to
project, difficult to influenced):
-
Possibility to partner with local schools
while implementing the project
-
Project might encourage other community
actors to do something for the promotion of sustainable development too
|
THREATHS
(external to
project, difficult to influenced):
-
Community members will not be interested
in outcomes of such project and hence its impact will be limited
-
Project sustainability – will there be any
opportunity to use project results for wider awareness-raising efforts after
the project has ended?
-
Local business might not be happy with
community members pointing out to environmental problems caused by their
activities
|
|
OUTPUT:
|
OUTCOME:
|
|
Output
1: 3
short videos produced showcasing consequences of unsustainable use of natural
resources in the community and solutions to those
|
Outcome
1.1: Local youth’s engagement in volunteer
activities increased as a result of their participation in the project
Outcome
1.2: Local
youth’s enhanced understanding of the sustainable use of natural resources as
a result of their participation in the project
|
|
Output
2: 10
photos showcasing consequences of unsustainable use of natural resources in
the community and solutions to those
|
Outcome
1.1: Local youth’s engagement in volunteer
activities increased as a result of their participation in the project
Outcome
1.2: Local
youth’s enhanced understanding of the sustainable use of natural resources as
a result of their participation in the project
|
|
Output
3: Videos
and photos made public in the community and their coverage in the local media
ensured
|
Outcome
1.1: Local
people’s raised awareness on the harmful impact of unsustainable use of
natural resources
Outcome
1.2: Local
people’s changed behavior in the use of natural resources
|
|
TIME (when)
|
ACTIVITY
(what)
|
VENUE (where)
|
PERSONS
RESPONSIBLE (who)
|
|
By 15
August
|
Mobilization
of volunteers through an online announcement
|
Online
youth platforms
|
|
|
By 31
August
|
Writing
scenarios for video and photo stories
|
At the
local community jointly with volunteers
|
|
|
During
September
|
Shooting
of video and photo stories
|
At the local
community jointly with volunteers
|
|
|
On 15
October
|
Event
to screen videos and exhibit photos
|
In a
yet-to-be-determined venue at the local community
|
|
|
From 15
October onwards
|
Continue
exhibition of photos at local community
|
Local
schools
|
|
|
|
Activity
|
Provider
|
Quantity
|
Price
|
|
1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|||
|
OUTPUT:
|
OUTCOME:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TIME (when)
|
ACTIVITY
(what)
|
VENUE (where)
|
PERSONS
RESPONSIBLE (who)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity
|
Provider
|
Quantity
|
Price
|
|
1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|||
